S.R.DONGAONKAR
Suresh s/o Govinda Nagdeve – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. The appellant No. 1 Suresh and appellant No. 2 Hivraj are taking exception to the judgment and order of conviction & sentence recorded by the learned First Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Gondia, dated 29.03.2006 in Sessions Trial No. 72/2004 by which he has convicted these appellants for the offence punishable under Section 376 (2)(g) of the I.P.C., and appellant No. 2 Hivraj being convicted for the offence punishable under Section 506(II) of the I.P.C. in addition. They were sentenced to suffer R.I. for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs. 2000/-in default to suffer R.I. for 6 months for the offence under Section 376(2)(g) of the I.P.C.
2. Brief facts leading to the prosecution of the appellants were that; they are resident of Boda, Tah. Tiroda, District Gondia. Prosecutrix Sangharsha PW-1 is a minor girl aged about 15 years. At the time of incident, her father was serving in Mahindra & Mahindra Automotive concern at Nagpur. She along with her mother PW-3 Sangita, brother, sister and grant father were residing at Boda. Her grand father owned agricultural land at the same place. The same is situated at a short distance from their residential house. The house of present app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.