SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Bom) 946

V.M.KANADE
MANJULA RARNLAL BAROT – Appellant
Versus
ISWARLAL P. BAROT – Respondent


( 1 ) BY this petition which is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of india and under Section 482 of Cr. P. C. , the petitioner is challenging the order passed by the Magistrate in C. C. No. 47/s/84 whereby the learned Magistrate was pleased to reject the application filed by the petitioner seeking direction from the Magistrate for the production of a document from the respondents Nos. 1 to 5 - original accused. Brief facts which are relevant for the purpose of deciding this petition are as under :

( 2 ) THE petitioner filed a criminal complaint in the Court of the Additional Chief metropolitan Magistrate against the respondents Nos. 1 to 5 for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 347, 348, 386, 395, 506 (ii) read with sections 120-B, 34 and 114 of the IPC.

( 3 ) IT is alleged in the said complaint that the respondents forcibly took possession of the premises where the complainant was residing with her husband, after obtaining a letter signed by petitioner's husband by threatening him of dire consequences if he did not sign the said letter.

( 4 ) THE petitioner had filed an application under Section 145 of the Cr. P. C. for recovery of possession






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top