SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Bom) 638

D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, SWATANTER KUMAR, V.C.DAGA
Shilpa Vishnu Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary – Respondent


Advocates appeared: .
For the Petitioner:R.K. Mendadkar with H.K. Mandlik, C.K. Bhangoji and V.A. Madane, P.C. Madhkholkar, R.G. Ketkar i/by R.S. Khadapkar, Anil S. Golegaonkar, R.S. Parsodkar, Aparajit Ninawe, Advocates. For the Respondents:V.A. Gangal, Senior Counsel with S.S. Deshmukh, Asstt. Special Counsel, Nitin Sambre, Government Pleader, Smt. S.W. Deshpande, Special Counsel, Mahesh Deshmukh, Special Counsel, Aurangabad and S.S. Deshmukh, V.S. Masurkar, Government Pleader, A.V. Anturkar i/by Ms. D.M. Shende, R.S. Apte i/by S.S. Shah for Surajmal Shah, Advocates.

JUDGMENT :-

Dr. D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.

THE CONTOURS OF THE CASE

The questions that arise before the Full Bench for determination relate to the standards which have to be applied in determining whether or not an applicant belongs to a designated Scheduled Tribe. Article 342 of the Constitution empowers the President to specify caste, races or tribes or parts or groups within them which shall be deemed to be Scheduled Tribes in relation to a State or a Union Territory. The power to include in or to exclude from the lists of Scheduled Tribes specified in a notification issued by the President is vested in Parliament. Pursuant to Article 342, the Scheduled Tribes were notified by the Constitution (Scheduled Tribes) Order, 1950. This was followed by the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1956. In 1976 Parliament enacted the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Order (Amendment) Act, 1976. Part IX of the Third Schedule to the Amending Act specifies Scheduled Tribes for the State of Maharashtra. Among the Scheduled Tribes which have been specified are:

(1) Mahadev Koli, Malhar Koli, Tokre Koli (Entries 28, 29 and 30);

(2) Dhanwar (Entry No.14)

(3) Thakur, Thakar,
















































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top