S.R.DONGAONKAR
SUBHAS MANIKRAO LAVHALE – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER, AMRAVATI – Respondent
Heard Shri Sandeep Chopde, Advocate, for the petitioner. Shri Jaiswal, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Shri P. C. Madkholkar, Advocate, for respondent No.5. None for respondent No.4. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the parties.
2. The petitioner, by way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeks to challenge the order passed by Additional Commissioner, Amravati Division, Amravati, in Appeal No. 13/BVP Act 16(2)/2007-08 of Bhaurad, Tq. and Distt. Akola, by which he set aside the order of the Additional Collector, Akola, in the matter of Election Dispute No. Bhaurad/4/2007-08 under section 33(5) of the Bombay Village Panchayat Act.
3. The petitioner was elected as Sarpanch in the election held on 29-122007 of Gram Panchayat Bhaurad. He is an elected member of the said Gram Panchayat, Bhaurad. So also respondent No.5. Total strength of members of Gram Panchayat Bhaurad is 17. The petitioner and respondent No.5 contested the said election for the post of Sarpanch. The petitioner got elected. The petitioner had received 9 votes, whereas respondent No.5 received 8 votes. The voting as per the demand of
Kuldip Nayar vs. Union of India and ors.
Sudhakar Gangaram Bahale vs. Madhukar Ramrao Bhuibhar and others
Jyoti Basu and others vs. Debi Ghosal and others
Hindurao Dnany Shirtode and another vs. State of Maharashtra and others
Shital Sudhir Sonavle vs. Group Gram Panchayat, Vaghoshi and ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.