B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, F.M.REIS
Laxmi w/o Vijay Verma – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through the Secretary, Urban Development Department – Respondent
B.P. Dharmadhikari, J.
1. Considering the nature of controversy, we have heard parties finally. Resignation letter dated 29/12/2008 submitted by present respondent No. 6 is found to be not signed by him in presence of respondent No. 3 Collector and, therefore, not in conformity with provisions of Section 41 (2) of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965; hereinafter referred to as 1965 Act. This finding recorded in favour of respondent No. 6 in his statutory revision by respondent No. 2 Additional Commissioner Amravati has been maintained by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3167 of 2009 vide judgment dated 6/8/2009. That writ petition was filed by present Appellant who came to be elected in by-election in vacancy caused because of acceptance of said resignation by respondent No. 3 Collector and she has been later on elected as President of respondent No. - 4 Municipal Council.
2. Before proceeding further it is advantages to reproduce above section 41 here.
"41. Term of office of Councilors.
(1). The term of office of the Councilors shall be Co-terminus with the duration of the Council.
(2). A councilor may resign h
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.