A.S.OKA
Sau. Vanita Pravin Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
Pravin Pundlik Gaikwad – Respondent
In this Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the following question arises for consideration "whether a matrimonial petition under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Act") filed in the court having jurisdiction under section 19 of the said Act will be governed by the constraints of Rule 1 of Order VIII of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as "the said Code") as amended by Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2002?"
2.The factual controversy is very narrow. The respondent-husband filed a petition for divorce under the said Act on various grounds. Written statement was filed by the petitioner-wife on 12th November, 2007. On 25th March, 2008, the learned Civil Judge (S.D.) permitted amendment to be carried out to the petition for divorce. Amended copy of the Petition was served to the petitioner on 8th April, 2008. An application made by the petitioner for grant of time to file additional written statement was rejected by the trial court on 8th October, 2008 on the ground that the Additional Written Statement was not filed within the time provided under the said Code. On 5th November, 2008,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.