ORAL JUDGMENT: [A.H. Joshi, J]:

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith by consent.

2. Heard learned Adv. Mr. S.R. Narnaware for the petitioner and learned Adv. Mr. S.M. Puranik for respondent no.2. Perused the documents annexed to the petition and also record of the Scrutiny Committee.

3. Petitioner was appointed by Order dated 29th July, 1989 in the post reserved for Scheduled Tribe.

4. The petitioner claims that she belongs to Scheduled Tribe -_ Halba_ , had applied for Caste Certificate, secured it and furnished the same at the time of appointment.

5. Petitioner_ s tribe claim was referred for verification to the Scrutiny Committee.

PETITIINER'S CASE BEFORE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE:

6. Petitioner submitted the information in the prescribed format and filed affidavit in support. In the said format, petitioner furnished information in vernacular. Translation of the points in prescribed proforma and the information furnished therein is as follows:-

(5) Qualification : IVth Standard. of father.

(6) Traditional occu- : Weaving. pation of family.

(7) Part or category of the Scheduled :Halba. Tribe/Sub-tribe claimed by the applicant.

(b) Dialect : Marathi.

(8)(a) Applicant's mother :

Click Here to Read the rest of this document