SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Bom) 218

Bombay High Court
B.N.DESHMUKH,S.C.PRATAP
State Bank of India - Appellant
Versus
Kalpaka Transport Co.Pvt.Ltd. - Respondent
Decided On : 11/17/1978

Advocates:
Soli Sorabjee, Addl. Solicitor General with K.K. Singhvi, A, Hidayatoola and Miss N.D. Kapadia, for Appellants; A.B. Diwan with S.N. Parikh and N.R. Kantawala (for No. 1); K.S. Cooper with S.N. Parikh, N.G. Thakkar and N.R. Kantawala (for No. 2), for Respondents.

The principles of natural justice apply even in matters of discounting bills where the acceptance of a transport operator's lorry receipt is a relevant fact.

Headnote:

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - ARTICLE 12 - STATE BANK OF INDIA - OTHER AUTHORITY - PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE - BLACKLISTING - TRANSPORT OPERATORS - SCHEME OF INDIAN BANK ASSOCIATION (IBA) - LIST OF APPROVED TRANSPORT OPERATORS - REMOVAL OF NAME FROM LIST - HEARING - REASONABLE OPPORTUNITY.

Fact of the Case:

The State Bank of India (SBI) removed the name of Kalpaka Transport Company Private Limited (Kalpaka) from the list of approved transport operators, effectively blacklisting the company from doing business with SBI and its subsidiaries. Kalpaka challenged this decision, arguing that SBI is a "State" or "other authority" under Article 12 of the Constitution of India and that the principles of natural justice apply even in matters of discounting bills where the acceptance of a transport operator's lorry receipt is a relevant fact.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that SBI is a "State" or "other authority" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution and that the principles of natural justice apply even in matters of discounting bills where the acceptance of a transport operator's lorry receipt is a relevant fact. The court further held that the removal of Kalpaka's name from the list of approved transport operators without a hearing was a violation of the principles of natural justice and that Kalpaka was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to be heard before its name was removed from the list.

Issues: 1. Whether the State Bank of India is a "State" or "other authority" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India? 2. Whether the principles of natural justice apply even in matters of discounting bills where the acceptance of a transport operator's lorry receipt is a relevant fact? 3. Whether the removal of Kalpaka's name from the list of approved transport operators without a hearing was a violation of the principles of natural justice?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that SBI is a "State" or "other authority" within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution because it is a statutory corporation vested with powers to carry out governmental or quasi-governmental functions, and it is controlled by the Government of India. 2. The court held that the principles of natural justice apply even in matters of discounting bills where the acceptance of a transport operator's lorry receipt is a relevant fact because the removal of a transport operator's name from the list of approved transport operators can have a significant impact on the operator's business. 3. The court held that the removal of Kalpaka's name from the list of approved transport operators without a hearing was a violation of the principles of natural justice because Kalpaka was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to be heard before its name was removed from the list.

Final Decision: The court allowed Kalpaka's petition and issued a direction to SBI to give a reasonable hearing to Kalpaka before delisting them from the approved list of transport operators.

Judgement

DESHMUKH, C.J. :- This appeal was expeditiously heard at the instance of the counsel for the State Bank of India. According to him, it raises an important question of all India importance and an earlier decision will enable the Bank to adjust its business dealings in the matter of discounting of bills.

2. The facts are not much in dispute. The appellants are the State Bank of India. They have branches all over India and all the former Indian State's Banks have been taken over by them as subsidiary Banks. The State Bank has been created under the State Bank of India Act of 1955 (No. 23 of 1955) and all the former State's Banks and Government associated Banks were taken over by the State Bank of India (Subsidiary Banks) Act, 1959. Various kinds of Banking business are being carried out by the State Bank of India, which include the discounting of bills, or the business of bill-purchase.

3. The State Bank of Mysore is the subsidiary of the State Bank of India. It has a branch at Tiptur in Karnataka. Respondent No. 1, the original petitioner, is the Kalpaka Transport Company Private Limited, incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, and carries on business as a public carrier all over India. Respondent No. 2, the original petitioner No. 2, is a Director of the first petitioner-Company.

4. This Company was floated in the year 1973, and became a private limited Company on 17th February 1973. When goods are loaded by their customers, the respondents issue, what are known as, Lorry Receipts, and undertake to carry the goods to the destination and deliver them as per instructions of the customers.

5. At Tiptur there are three different firms named D.S. Mullappa and Sons, D.S. Mallappa and Company and Deshmudre and Company, dealing in Kopra. All the firms are practically owned by the same persons. They had dealings in Kopra, and had an account with the State Bank of Mysore, at Tiptur, for the purpose of discounting their bills. These bills were always accompanied by Lorry Receipts, and, according to the usual banking practice, to the extent of the limit allowed, these bills were being discounted.

6. As it appears, before the Indian Bank Association was formed, and a Scheme was framed by them for recommending transport operators to

member banks, each branch dealt with the firms directly, to whom bill discounting facility was permitted. The transport operator, who issued the Lorry Receipts, was hardly in the picture.

7. In that manner, the three firms were discounting their bills with the State Bank of Mysore, Tiptur Branch, for a number of years, and had a large credit with that Bank.

8. Sometime in June of 1974 the Indian Bank Association prepared a Scheme for recommending transport operators to member Banks. Under this Scheme the Indian Bank Association (hereinafter referred to as 'IBA') was formed, consisting of several banking institutions as its members. This Association floated a Scheme, under which transport operators, who wanted their Lorry Receipts to be accepted for the purpose of discounting the bills of the Bank's clients, had to apply to the IBA.

They have to establish their credibility and worth in the market. If the IBA finds that the transport operator is of the requisits type, it would accept him and put him on the approved list of the IBA. One of the important conditions, which a transport operator had to agree to, was to issue the Lorry Receipts in a certain special form. If that was done, the transport operator had to bear full responsibility of loss caused to the Bank by the goods not reaching the destination for any reason whatsoever. In other words, they had to agree to the Bank being treated as the owners of the goods and for any loss caused for any reason to the Bank. In other words, in addition to the normal responsibility cast on the transport operator, full security was available to the Banks in the form of an undertaking given by the transport operator by agreeing to certain terms and conditions of the co















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top