P.R.BORKAR
HARIBAI DIGAMBARRAO BHISE – Appellant
Versus
INDRABAI VENKATRAO KADAM – Respondent
( 2 ) BRIEF facts giving rise to this appeal may be stated as follows : one Mukundrao had two wives, Tulsabai and rangubai. Original appellant Haribai is daughter of rangubai. Haribai expired pending this Second Appeal. Tulsabai had daughter Kaveri. Present plaintiff/respondent Indrabai is daughter of Kaveri. It is not disputed that Tulsabai, Rangubai, Kaveri had expired during life time of Mukundrao and there was no son born to Tulsabai or Rangubai or to Kaveri. Mukundrao expired on 28. 3. 1976. Present respondent/plaintiff Indrabai filed suit for partition and separate possession of the property of Mukundrao. The suit was resisted by present appellant/defendant Haribai on the ground that she is sole successor of Mukundrao, as Mukundrao had executed a will in her favour on 2
REFERRED TO : Parvathy Nadachy Umayparvathy Nadachy vs Ramalekshmy Seethalekshmy Ammal
Ram Gopal vs Nand Lal and others
Ramkishorelal and another vs. Kamalnarayan
Keshav Kumar Swarup vs Flowmore Private Limited
Raghupati Janardhan Kathale and ors. vs Pundlik Balaji Upadhye and ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.