N.A.BRITTO
Ranjit Satardekar – Appellant
Versus
Joe Mathias – Respondent
BRITTO N.A., J: - Rule. By consent heard forthwith.
2. This writ petition is directed against judgment dated 14-2-2008 of the learned Administrative Tribunal, Panaji, by which the appeal filed by the petitioner against the Order dated 29-8-2007 of the learned Additional Collector has been dismissed.
3. The controversy is regarding non registration of the final Chart of Partition dated 18-8-2006, in Inventory Proceedings bearing No. 310/2004/ A (new) held upon the death of Smt. Ana Maria Estrocio, wife of Andre Estrocio which are governed by Articles 2064 to 2166 of the Civil Code, 1867 and Articles 1369 to 1447 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1939, (both Portuguese legislations in force in the State of Goa, hereinafter referred to as Civil Code and C.P.C., respectively). The dispute is regarding property described under verba/item No. I, surveyed under No. 249/ I-A of village Taleigao in which the petitioner and his wife had purchased 6.66% share, Sadiq Sheik and his wife had purchased 3.33% share and the remaining 80% share was held by deceased respondent No.2 Clotildes Fernandes. In the licitation held in the said inventory on 10-2-2006, the respondent No. 1 (respondent, for s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.