B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.

1. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution questions the administrative decision of the High Court, rejecting the petitioner's application for the post of Judge – Family Court, on the ground that she was less than 35 years of age as on 27/9/2009. By an interim order dated 23/4/2010 respondent nos.1 and 2 were directed to permit the petitioner to participate in the process of selection for the post of Judge – Family Court scheduled to commence from 2/5/2010 and it was further directed that the result of selection process of the petitioner should not be declared without obtaining permission of the court. It was further clarified that the grant of permission to participate in the selection process was provisional and shall not create any equity in favour of the petitioner and shall be subject to the final result in the petition. However, it appears that the Selection Committee by its decision dated 30/4/2010 postponed the selection process. It appears, subsequently, this petition as well as other petitions came to be transferred to the Principal Bench and re-registered. Civil Application No. 2741 of 2010 for amendment was allowed by us on