K.U.CHANDIWAL
Fulchand s/o Laxman Bangade – Appellant
Versus
Anil s/o Janbaji Pund – Respondent
Heard.
Rule.
Rule returnable forthwith.
By consent of parties, matter is finally heard at admission stage.
The landlord is before this Court questioning the findings recorded by the learned District Judge-5, Nagpur in Regular Civil Appeal No.526/2006 whereby the learned Judge has set aside the decree dated 30-9-2006 of learned 2nd Additional Small Causes Court, Nagpur in R.C.S. No.100/2002.
The landlord initiated the proceedings against the respondent-tenant on the grounds-
(a) Change of business from the purpose for which it was let out;
(b) Sub-letting of the premises;
(c) Guilty of conduct which is a nuisance or annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier;
(d) Arrears of rent; and
(e) Not using the suit premises continuously for period of 6 months.
2. The learned counsel for the landlord and for tenant-respondent dwell upon two points, which ultimately germane after the judgment of the District Judge. The two points are -
(1) Whether in the circumstances it is proved that the conduct of the respondent-tenant is a nuisance or annoyance to the adjoining or neighbouring occupier in terms of section 16(c) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999; and
(2) Whether th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.