ANOOP V.MOHTA, D.Y.CHANDRACHUD
Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
DR. D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, J.
1. The subject matter of these proceedings is a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The Petitioners who are developers seek to impugn an order dated 6 December 2010 passed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority by which he has issued directions to process a letter of intent in favour of the Sixth Respondent on the ground that 70% of the members of the cooperative society eligible and present have “ ” supported the Sixth respondent at a meeting of the general body. The Petitioners also seek the issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Slum Rehabilitation Authority to process a proposal for redevelopment submitted by them and to consider the issuance of a letter of intent. Until that is done, the Petitioners have sought an injunction restraining the authority from considering any other proposal or application for the change of a developer.
2. The Fourth and Fifth Respondents are cooperative societies proposed to be formed of slum dwellers of land comprised in City Survey No.136 Part, 2/136 Part, 110 Part and 109 Part of Lower Parel Division at Worli, M
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.