MRIDULA BHATKAR
Abedali Khan s/o Rahematali Khan – Appellant
Versus
Devidas s/o Dhonduji Poghe – Respondent
Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. With the consent of parties, this petition is heard finally at the stage of admission.
2. By this writ petition, petitioner takes an exception to the order dated 2nd May 2011 passed by 5th Civil Judge, Junior Division, Hingoli wherein the objection raised by the petitioner/judgment debtor in Execution Proceedings No.3 of 2011 was rejected.
3. Petitioner has filed a Civil Suit bearing No.96/2010 on 6.8.2010 for injunction in which it is prayed that the respondent/defendant be restrained from evicting the petitioner, without due process of law. It is the case of the petitioner that in the month of February 2000, respondent let out his house No.7 for rent of Rs.500/-per month and since then he is residing there as a tenant by paying amount of Rs.500/-from time to time without any arrears. Respondent in 2010, started disturbing the possession of the petitioner and directed him to vacate the premises. Respondent had entered the house and asked him to vacate it. Respondent filed written statement on 23.9.2010 and denied all the averments made and contentions raised by the petitioner. Respondent denied that petitioner is a tenant and is paying r
Firozi Lal Jain Vs. Man Mal and another
Smt. Kaushalya Devi and others Vs. K.L.Bansal
Sushil Kumar Mehta Vs. Gobind Ram Bohra
Gangadeep Pratishthan Pvt. Ltd.
Pushpa Devi Bhagat (D) by L.R. Vs. Rajinder Singh and Ors.
Mathulla Verghese & another Vs. Vijaya Rajaratnam (Mrs.) and ors.
Roshan Lal and another Vs. Madan Lal and others. AIR 1975 SC 2130
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.