1 Heard learned Counsel for petitioners.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned Counsel for respective parties. Learned Counsel for respective respondents waive service of Rule.

2 This writ petition is filed challenging the judgment and order dated 20.06.2009, passed by the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Aurangabad, in Appeal No.15/2007.

Petitioners herein are Respondents No.1 & 2 in the said appeal and Respondent No.3 herein is the original appellant. The said appeal was filed by Respondent No.3 herein challenging the order of termination dated 15.06.2007. The copy of the appeal memo and also grounds taken in the appeal are placed on record at Exhibit-A on pages 17 to 69 of the compilation of this Writ Petition. Therefore, the facts leading to filing of such appeal are not repeated herein since those are extensively stated by the appellant in the appeal memo.

It appears that after recording the evidence, considering pleadings of the parties and documentary evidence, the Presiding Officer, School Tribunal, Aurangabad, by his judgment and order dated 20.06.2009, allowed the appeal filed by Respondent No.3 herein thereby setting a