B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, A.P.BHANGALE
Madhukar Govindrao Thaware – Appellant
Versus
Central Bank of India – Respondent
A.P. BHANGALE, J
1. Taken up for hearing by consent of learned Advocates appearing. Heard submissions. This Writ Petition is preferred in respect of an order dated 5th January 2011 passed by Debts Recovery appellate Tribunal, Mumbai and an order dated 17th March 2009 passed by Debts Recovery Tribunal, Nagpur whereby it is held that the provisions of Limitation Act are applicable to an appeal under Section 30 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and financial Institutions Act (Briefly referred as RDDBFI Act). The question raised is as to whether the provisions of section 5 of the Limitation Act or its principles are applicable to appeal filed under section 30 of the RDDBFI Act.
2. The facts which gave rise to filing of the writ petition may be summed as under:
The Petitioners are owners of Apartments in the building known as ‘Jupiter Complex’ Situated at Vaishali Nagar, Binaki, Nagpur. The Petitioners claim that they were handed over possession of their respective apartments in the building pursuant to an agreement for sale of undivided share in the land and building construction executed in the year 1987.The respondent Central Bank of India , on the ground that the bo
Commissioner of Customs & Central excise v M/s. Hongo India (Pvt) Ltd 2009 (4) SCALE 374
Gopal Sardar v Karuna Sardar (2004) 4 SCC 252
Hukumdev Narain v Lalit Narain Misra (1974) 2 SCC 133
Anwari Basavraj v Siddaramiah & ors. (1993) 1 SCC 636
Union of India v. Popular Construction Company (2001) 8 SCC 470 UCO
Union of India v Delhi High Court Bar Association AIR 2002 SC 1479
Damodaran Pillai v South Indian Bank Ltd. (2005) 7 SCC 300
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.