SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Bom) 1284

A.P.BHANGALE
Arun – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant:Ms Preeti Rane, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Ms R.A. Deshpande, APP.

Judgment :

The Appellant has challenged the validity and legality of the Judgment and Order dated 21st July, 1998 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 1995, whereby the appellant (accused) was found guilty of offence punishable under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and he was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of which to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months. By the impugned Judgment and Order, the appellant (accused) was however acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Facts briefly stated are as under:-

Deceased Renukabai, who was sister of first informant namely; Manohar Khedikar, had married with appellant (accused) on 30/05/1994, and was residing with her husband. It is the case of prosecution that at the time of marriage, a sum of Rs. 2,000/-, gold ring and a wrist watch were given to the appellant (accused). At the time of Ashadi (the festival when the married woman visits her parents) in 1994, deceased had visited house of first informant namely Manohar Khedikar (brother of deceased). At that time, she conveyed the


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top