SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1953 Supreme(Bom) 130

R.S.BAVDEKAR, VYAS
Durgadas Tulsiram Sood – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Ajit R. Malhotra, K.A. Somjee, V.H. Kamat, V.S. Desai

JUDGMENT

Vyas, J.

[1] These are two appeals by accused Nos. 1 and 2. Appeal No. 672 is an appeal by accused No. 2 and Appeal No. 807 is an appeal by accused No. 1. These are appeals from a judgment of the learned Presidency Magistrate, 23rd Court, esplanade, Bombay, by which judgment the learned Magistrate has convicted both the accused of offences under Section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, Section 465 read with Section 34, Section 468 read with Section 34, Section 471 read with sections 465 and 34 and Section 420 read with Section 511 and 34 of the Indian penal Code.

[2] Originally there were three accused persons in this case. The gravamen of the charge against them was that there was a criminal conspiracy between them to forge an auditors' certificate the purport of which was to show that the past imports of Goldberg India Ltd. , for the year 1947-48 received at the port of bombay were of the value of Rs. 1,15,710 and the purpose of which was to induce the Chief Controller of Imports, Bombay, to grant to the Goldberg India Ltd. , an import licence for the amount Of Rs. 28,927. The object of the conspirators is alleged to have been to use the above said forged certificate of the





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top