S.C.DHARMADHIKARI
Rekha Mahindra Shah – Appellant
Versus
Gautam Umed Parmar – Respondent
1. The Applicant/Accused has approached this Court in revisional jurisdiction challenging the Judgment and Order dated 5th September, 2011 delivered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Criminal Appeal No.19 of 2008. By this Judgment and Order, the learned Additional Sessions Judge has confirmed the Judgment and Order dated 12th December, 2007 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, 10th Court, Kolhapur in Summary Criminal Case No.2252 of 2005. The learned Magistrate had convicted and sentenced the Applicant/Original Accused for an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, (for short “the N.I. Act”).
2. It is common ground that the Original Complainant/Respondent No.1 before me carries on business in the name and style M/s. Parmar Steel at Kolhapur. It is alleged by the Respondent No.1/Original Complainant that the Applicant/Original Accused approached him in 2004-05 and purchased M.A. Structure goods on credit basis. Towards purchase of these materials, the Applicant/Original Accused issued three cheques drawn on the Karnataka Bank Limited, Shahupuri Branch at Kolhapur dated 12th April, 2005 of total amount of Rs.5,00
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.