R.C.CHAVAN
Manohar Rangnath Patil – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
1. This appeal is directed against the conviction of the appellant husband for offences punishable under Section 498A, 304-B and 306 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of rigorous imprisonment for 3 years with fine of Rs. 500/- or in default rigorous imprisonment for one month, rigorous imprisonment for 7 years and rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.500/- or in default rigorous imprisonment for one month and rigorous imprisonment for three years with fine of Rs.500/- or in default rigorous imprisonment for one month, respectively on each of the three counts, imposed upon the appellant by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, on conclusion of Sessions Case No.707 of 1990.
2. Facts which are material for deciding this appeal are as under:- The victim was married to the appellant on 13th May, 1990. She went to reside at the house of the appellant. In the marriage there was demand of certain articles which included wrist watch. The demand of gold ring had been fulfilled. Wrist watch, however, had not been supplied. This led to ill-treatment to the victim at the hands of the appellant. Soon after marriage, on 29th May, 1990 when the victi
State of West Bengal Vs. Orilal Jaiswal
Satvir Singh and Anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Ramesh Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Gananath Pattnaik Vs. State of Orissa
State of Karnataka Versus M.V. Manjunathegowda and Am
Hiralal and Ors Vs. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
Sampath Kumar Vs. Inspector of Police Krishnagiri
Mohan Vs. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.