A.P.BHANGALE
Akash Impex – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai – Respondent
1. The appeal is against the Judgment and order dated 14-03-2011 in L.C Suit no 325 of 2011 passed by the learned City Civil judge, Mumbai whereby the suit as well as the Notice of Motion was dismissed in liminem. By civil application 2797 of 2011 same prayer is made as in the Appeal.
2. The facts stated are:-
The appellant (Original plaintiffs referred hereinafter as Plaintiff) claimed that it is a registered partnership firm which had acquired suit property Gala No.24/25, CTS No. 240-C of village Kurla - 1 at Khetani Industrial Estate, Kurla, Mumbai, at auction Sale. According to the appellant, the residents of the Society had filed Writ petition no. 1763 of 2010 alleging the unauthorised additions, alterations to the existing premises. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (hereinafter referred as MCGM) issued notice under Section 354-A of the M.M.C. Act. This notice was issued requiring the plaintiff-appellant to stop the unlawful construction detected by the MCGM. The notice was challenged in the Suit no. 2332 of 2010 which is still pending before the Bombay City Civil Court, Mumbai. According to the plaintiff-appellant the suit structure was protected by interim
Salem Advocates Bar Association
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Ajay Sinha and another
Bhagwat Singh vs. State of Rajasthan AIR 1964 SC 444
Kasturi and Sons vs Salivateswaran AIR 1958 SC 507
Upper Doab Sugar Mills vs. Shabdara (Delhi) Saharanpur Light Railway : AIR 1963 SC 217
Krishan Lal Vs State of J & K reported in (1994) 4 SCC 422
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.