ROSHAN DALVI
Parekh Holdings – Appellant
Versus
Mohamed Yusuf Trust – Respondent
1. The petitioner claims injunction under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against respondent No.1 who is the trust and respondent Nos. 2 to 7 who are trustees of respondent No.1 trust pending the arbitration invoked by the petitioner against selling, mortgaging, transferring, encumbering, alienating, disposing of or creating any third party rights or granting any development right or parting with possession of the property called Nawab House/Nhava House, 65, Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai – 400 002.
2. The parties have entered into a development agreement on 9th April, 2005 pursuant to the trustees of respondent No.1 Trust having passed a resolution by majority in terms of the deed of trust under which they are appointed inter alia for executing such agreement.
3. A resolution has been passed in the meeting of the Trustees dated 9th September, 2004. There are six trustees of respondent No.1 trust. Respondent Nos. 2 to 6 attended the meeting. The respondent No.7 was absent despite notice. All the respondents who attended the meeting except respondent No.6 agreed to execute the development agreement.
4. The development agreement dated 8th April, 2005 was
OLYMPUS SUPERSTRUCTURES PVT. LTD. VS. MEENA VIJAY KHETAN & RS. (1999) 5 SCC 651
BOOZ ALLEN AND HAMILTON INC. VS. SBI HOME FINANCE LIMITED AND OTHERS (2011) 5 SCC 532
Indowind Energy Ltd. vs. Wescare (I) Ltd. & Anr. AIR 2010 SC 1793
Sukanya Holdings Pvt. Ltd Vs. Jayesh H. Pandya AIR 2003 SC 2252
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.