A.P.BHANGALE
Shewantabai – Appellant
Versus
Purushottam – Respondent
1. Heard finally with the consent of the learned Counsel for the respective parties.
2. Admitted on the following substantial question of law:
Whether in the facts and circumstances the first Appellate Court erred by refusing to hear first appeal on merits by refusing to condone delay?
My answer is in the affirmative for the reasons as stated below.
3. This appeal arises from order dt. 8.11.2012 passed by the learned Principal District Judge, Wardha whereby the learned first Appellate Judge refused to condone delay on the ground of absence of reasonable explanation for the delay caused to prefer the First Appeal. It appears that present appellants are, in fact, legal heirs of appellant before the first Appellate Court namely Smt. Shewantabai Kashinath Kumbhare, who is referred to in the impugned order and who is no more living. Most of the reasoning given by the first Appellate Judge was about age of applicant Shewantabai as to whether she was aged 67 years or 82 years and also certificate regarding medical treatment of Shewantabai as to whether she was suffering from hypertension, anaemia with general debility due to old age and whether she was advised bed rest for the period
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.