V.K.TAHILRAMANI, V.L.ACHLIYA
Nandkumar Sitaram Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
SMT. V.K. TAHILRAMANI, J. :- The appellant (original accused) has preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 25/4/2008 passed by the learned 3rdAdditionai Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, in Sessions Case No. 120 of 2006. By the said judgment and order, the learned Sessions Judge convicted the appellant u/s 376 (2)(f), 324 and 354 of Indian Penal Code ("IPC" for short). For the offence punishable u/s 376(2) (f) of IPC, the appellant was sentenced to suffer RI for ten years and fine of Rs.1000/-. In default RI for six months. For the offence punishable u/s 324 of IPC the appellant was sentenced to suffer RI for three years and fine of Rs.1000/-. In default RI for six months. no separate sentence was imposed on the appellant for the offence u/s 354 of IPC. The substantive sentences u/s 376(2)(f) and 324 of IPC were directed to run concurrently.
2. The prosecution case briefly stated is as under;
PW 3 Maya was residing at Raman Mala, Taluka Karvir, Dist. Kolhapur. The appellant was residing in front of her' house. The victim girl, who was aged about 6 years, at the time of incident, was residing in the same area along with her family.
It is the prosecution case that on 9
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.