SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Bom) 1347

Z.A.HAQ
Ramchandra Guja Rewatkar – Appellant
Versus
Mango Vithya Koche – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Shri P.A. Markandeywar, Advocate for petitioner.

ORAL JUDGMENT :

Heard Shri P.A. Markandeywar, the learned Advocate for the petitioner. None appears for the respondents.

2. The petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Executing Court rejecting the application filed by the petitioner for grant of possession as per the decree of specific performance of contract, in favour of the petitioner. Initially, the petitioner had challenged the impugned order in revision under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure vide Civil Revision Application No.737 of 1999. When the revision was listed for final hearing, the learned Advocate for the respondents had raised the objection that the civil revision application was not maintainable and this Court by the order dated 04.09.2013 allowed the petitioner to convert the civil revision application into writ petition. The petitioner has, accordingly, taken steps and now this writ petition is listed for final hearing.

3. After the petitioner had converted the civil revision application in to writ petition, it is renumbered as Writ Petition No.4908 of 2013. This Court by the order dated 13.03.2014 directed issuance of notices to the respondents, for final disposal. On that date, Shri Nitin V






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top