1. Heard Mr. S.N. Bhattad, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. D.C. Naukarkar, learned Counsel for Respondent No.1.

2. The petitioner has challenged the Award, dt.11.8.2006 passed by the Industrial Court, Nagpur in Complaint (ULPN) No.203 of 2005 whereby the respondent (Original Complainant) was ordered to be given work with effect from 11.8.2006 after declaring termination of the respondent from service as unlawful. Consequential relief that she shall not be forced to work under any other Contractor was also granted.

3. Sometimes in the year 2000, the petitioner had decided to recruit the workers for class III and class IV category of employees. According to the petitioner, the work was not of regular or permanent nature, but as per need of the hospital. The respondent had joined the service with the petitioner as a Sweeper in the hospital on 14.1.2000. The respondent had joined as a Sweeper, but her service was discontinued by coercing her to work under another Contractor while obtaining her signature upon a blank paper. Thus, complaint of unfair labour practice was filed under Item No. 9 of the schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Preventio