R.D.DHANUKA
Kusum Bharat Asarpota – Appellant
Versus
Jagdish Damodardas Asarpota – Respondent
1. Applicants in the chamber summons are the original defendants (caveators). Applicant in the notice of motion is original petitioner (plaintiff). The applicants in the chamber summons have prayed for leave to place on record an additional affidavit dated 6th April, 2014 in support of the caveat on their behalf. Applicant in the Notice of Motion has prayed for dismissal of caveat dated 9th July, 2012 and affidavit in support of caveat dated 13th July, 2012 of the caveators and seeks declaration that the caveat as well as affidavit in support are not maintainable. By consent of parties both the proceedings were heard together and are being disposed of by a common order. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding these two proceedings are as under :-
2. Smt. Kusum Bharat Asarpota is widow of the deceased late Mr. Bharat Ladharam Asarpota who has alleged to have executed a Will dated 15th June 1996 and had appointed the plaintiff as the executrix of the said Will. The plaintiff also claims to be the sole legatee to the properties of her late husband under the said Will. On 12th March, 2009 the testator expired. On 20th November, 2011 the plaintiff herein filed a pe
Heeralal vs. Kalyan Mal and others AIR 1998 SC 618
Krishna Kumar Birla vs. Rajendrasingh Lodha (2008) 4 SCC 300
G. Gopal vs. C. Baskar and others (2008) 10 SCC 489
Jagjit Singh and others vs. Pamela Manmohan Singh (2010) 5 SCC 157
Elizabeth Antony v. Michel Charles John Chown Lengera (1990) 3 SCC 333
Kanwarjit Singh Dhillon v. Hardyal Singh Dhillon (2007) 11 SCC 357
Basanti Devi v. Ravi Prakash Ram Prasad Jaiswal (2008) 1 SCC 267
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.