Anoop V. Mohta, J.

1. Rule.

Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. The Petitioner has prayed as under:

“a) …...to correct the model answers and reassess the Impugned Results dated 20th May 2015 on the basis of the corrected model answers;

b) …..to allot all the students seats on the basis of marks/rankings as determined post reassessment of the Impugned Results dated 20th May, 2015.

c) …..thereby directing the Respondent No.1 to reassess the entire answer sheets of all the students appearing for the CLAT, 2015 examinations on the basis of the correct model answers;

d) …..direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India thereby directing the Respondent No.1 to reassess the entire answer sheets on the basis of the correct model answers and award One mark each to all those students who have attempted these disputed questions or in the alternative direct that the disputed questions should not be considered while computing the ranking or the markings and while allotting the seats in the institutions participating in CLAT, 2015;

e) That pending