In the High Court of Bombay at Nagpur
A.B. CHAUDHARI & P.N. DESHMUKH, JJ.
Kishor & Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Another – Respondent
Criminal Application [APL] Nos. 469 of 2011, 542 of 2011, 507 of 2011, 508 of 2011, 509 of 2011, 510 of 2011, 511 of 2011 & 512 of 2011
Decided On : 26-06-2015
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 156(3) - JURISDICTION - LOCUS STANDI - CIVIL DISPUTE - APPLICATION OF MIND - SECTION 482 - SECTION 154(1) AND 154(3) - JUDICIAL OFFICERS PROTECTION ACT, 1850 - SECTION 1 - REGULARIZATION OF ENCROACHMENTS - MALAFIDE INTENT - ABUSE OF POWER - INVESTIGATION - COSTS - SUPERVISION OF INVESTIGATION.
Fact of the Case:
The complaint was filed by respondent no.2 before the Magistrate under various Sections of the Indian Penal Code, alleging that the applicants, who were the Secretary, President, and Trustees of the Jawaharlal Darda Education Society, had made illegal orders for the regularization of encroachments made by the Trust on open spaces in a housing colony, in violation of the rules and regulations and the wishes of the plot holders. The Magistrate, by the impugned order, rejected the request for issuance of direction under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against accused no.11 Joseph Imanuil and the then Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan but directed the investigation against others arrayed as accused in the complaint. The applicants challenged the order, contending that the complaint was frivolous and malicious, that they had the authority to make the regularization orders, and that the dispute was of a civil nature. Respondent no.2 contended that he had locus standi to file the complaint as he had power of attorney of five plot owners of the housing colony and that the offences alleged were serious and cognizable.
Finding of the Court:
The Court held that respondent no.2 had locus standi to file the complaint as the offences alleged were serious and cognizable, and that the nature of the dispute being of a civil nature was not a ground to quash the proceedings. The Court further held that the Magistrate had applied his mind to the averments in the complaint and the documents and that the ultimate conclusion of the Magistrate to issue direction for investigation was right. The Court also held that the Ex-Chief Minister did not have the authority to issue directions to regularize the constructions and that the investigation must be carried out.
Issues: 1. Whether respondent no.2 had locus standi to file the complaint? 2. Whether the nature of the dispute being of a civil nature was a ground to quash the proceedings? 3. Whether the Magistrate had applied his mind to the averments in the complaint and the documents? 4. Whether the ultimate conclusion of the Magistrate to issue direction for investigation was right? 5. Whether the Ex-Chief Minister had the authority to issue directions to regularize the constructions? 6. Whether the investigation must be carried out?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. A person has locus standi to file a complaint under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure if the offences alleged are serious and cognizable. 2. The nature of the dispute being of a civil nature is not a ground to quash the proceedings. 3. The Magistrate must apply his mind to the averments in the complaint and the documents before issuing direction for investigation. 4. The ultimate conclusion of the Magistrate to issue direction for investigation must be based on the facts and circumstances of the case. 5. The Chief Minister does not have the authority to issue directions to regularize constructions in private layouts. 6. Investigation must be carried out in cases where serious and cognizable offences are alleged.
Final Decision: The Court dismissed all the applications filed by the applicants, with costs. The Court also directed the State of Maharashtra to appoint a high level officer to supervise the investigation, which shall be completed within four months.
1. Jawaharlal Darda Education Society, Yavatmal, is a registered Society/Public Trust running educational institutions. Shri Kishor Sureshchandra Darda is the Secretary of the said society. Shri Prakash Dhanraj Chopda is the President of the society. Shri Vijay Jawaharlal Darda, the ex-President of the society and a Sitting Member of the Parliament, is now the Trustee of the Trust. Shri Rajendra Jawaharlal Darda is the Vice President of the society who was also Cabinet Minster of the State Government in the last government. Devendra s/o Vijay Darda and Rushi s/o Rajendra Darda, the sons are also the trustees of the said trust along with Kirti Dhanraj Gandhi. Ashok Shankarrao Chauhan was the then Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra. For brevity, the criminal applications filed by them, which are being disposed of, by this common judgment, are specified as under:-
2. Criminal Application (APL) No.469/2011 is filed by
Kishor s/o Sureshchandra Darda:-
Respondent no.2 - Digamber Haribhau Pajgade resident of Yavatmal filed a complaint under various Sections i.e.120-B/34, 420/34, 468/34, 447/34, 474/34, 466/34 and 166/34 of Indian Penal Code in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Yavatmal, which was registered as Regular Criminal Case No.406/2011 and in which in all 18 accused were named including the above persons. The learned Magistrate, by making impugned order, rejected the request for issuance of direction under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (“Code”) against accused no.11 Joseph Imanuil and Shri Prithviraj Chavan, the then Chief Minister but directed the investigation against others i.e. 01 to 10 and 12 to 17 arrayed as accused in the said complaint by his order dated 25.8.2011. It is that order, which is under challenge, in these various applications. Since the order is one and though the applicants are different with different criminal applications filed in this Court, they were taken up together for final disposal, particularlybecause, they have been pending since the year 2011 in this Court with interim orders operating therein.
ARGUMENTS:
3. Criminal Application (APL) No.542/2011 is filed by Ashok Shankarrao Chavan:-
Shri S.V. Manohar, the learned Advocate for the applicant in this case, made the following submissions:-
[i] In the complaint that was filed by respondent no.2 before the Magistrate, the only allegation against the applicant, who was the Ex-Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra is that, acting as a Chief Minister, having portfolio of Urban Development Department, he made orders on 7.10.2009 and 23.06.2010, etc., for regularization, relaxation etc., in respect of alleged encroachments made by the Jawaharlal Darda Trust without any authority or in violation of the Rules and Regulations and recommendations made by the subordinate officers and in contravention to the wishes of the plot holders, who have their houses in the colony. He submitted that as a Head of the Department of the Urban Development and Minister thereof, he has had an authority and power to make the order of regularization and accordingly in exercise of that power he made those orders of regularization which was his function and duty, but the same cannot be the subject matter of a criminal case.
[ii] The orders made by the applicant, the then Chief Minister, for regularization of the alleged encroachments in the open spaces in the colony of the Housing Society by constructing the school have not been declared to be illegal or invalid or without any authority by any Competent Court of law or the authority and on the contrary even now those orders stand as they are and, therefore, there was no cause of action for setting the criminal law in motion at the instance of respondent no.2, who is busy body and a court-bird and he is having habit of filing cases after cases against many persons with ill-motives. At any rate, till the time the orders made by the applicant in the matter of regularization are not declared
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.