ANOOP V.MOHTA, A.A.SAYED
Habib Educational & Welfare Society's M. S. College of Law – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Anoop V. Mohta, J.
Rule, returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.
2. As in all these matters the basic issues are common and so also the Respondents, we are disposing of all these Petitions by this common judgment.
3. In Writ Petition No.6002/2015, the Petitioners have applied for New Law College at Palghar within time from the academic year 2015-16. The University has recommended their case. The State Government, however, has not taken decision on individual Application filed by the Petitioners. In Writ Petition No.4831/2015, the Petitioners have applied for starting additional new Degree Courses in the Petitioner's existing college at Palghar for the academic year 2015-16 and accordingly applied within time. The University has recommended the Petitioner's case. The Respondent/State, however, has not taken decision on individual Application filed by the Petitioner. In Writ Petition No. 6018 of 2015, the Petitioner has applied for starting various courses in M. S. College of Arts, Science, Commerce and BMS at Palghar within time for the academic year 2015-16. The University recommended the case. The State Government has not taken decision on individual Appl
Ghaziabad Development Authority v. Union of AIR 2000 SC 2003
Sindhi Education Society v. Govt (NCT of Delhi) (2010) 8 SCC 49
Bajaj Hindustan Limited v. Sir Shad Lal Enterprises Limited and anr.
Transport & Dock Workers Union v. Mumbai Port Trust
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.