SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(SC) 1153

MARKANDEY KATJU, GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Bajaj Hindustan Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

SLP ) No.1398 of 2006

1. As prayed by learned counsel Mr. Parijat Sinha this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Civil Appeal No.5856 of 2005

2. These petitions have been filed against the judgment and order dated 24.08.2005 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.36685 of 2004 of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

3. By that decision the High Court has quashed the Press Note Number 12 dated 31.8.1998 and Notification SO 808(E) dated 11.9.1998, issued by the Central Government, by which the Sugar Industry was de-licensed under Section 29B of the Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act'.) As a consequence, the High Court has debarred the respondent number 6 from establishing a sugar industry without obtaining a licence under Section 11 of the Act. The High Court has also cancelled the permission, if any, granted to the respondent number 5 to 6 for purchasing and/or acquiring land for the purposed of establishing new sugar industries without licence.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the effect of the impugned judgment and order quashing of the Notification dated 11.9.1998 and the Press Note dated 31.8.199























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top