V.K.TAHILRAMANI, A.K.MENON
Ravindra Harshad Parmar – Appellant
Versus
Dimple Ravindra Parmar – Respondent
A.K. Menon, J.
1. By the present appeal, the appellant challenges the order dated 14th June, 2013 passed by the Family Court Pune in a petition filed by the Respondent-wife seeking divorce under the provisions of Section 13(1)(ia), 25 & 26 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (the Act). The impugned order is passed on an application challenging the territorial jurisdiction of the Family Court, Pune to try the petition seeking divorce filed by the Respondent under section 13(1)(ia), 25 & 26 of the Act. While the main petition is filed by the Respondent-wife on 5th November, 2012, the present application is taken out on 22nd March, 2013 seeking framing of a preliminary issue of jurisdiction of the Family Court and dismissal of the petition for want of proper jurisdiction and in the alternative for return of the petition for filing before the appropriate Court in New Jersey, USA.
2. The facts in brief leading to the present application are:-
The Appellant (original Respondent) immigrated to U.S.A. in the year 1994 and obtained a green card. The Appellant became a naturalised US citizen. The marriage between him and the Respondent was solemnized on 21st November, 2002. The marriage was
Rhodia Ltd. and Ors. vs. Neon Laboratories Ltd. AIR 2002 Bom. 502
Y. Narsimha Rao and Others and Y. Venkata Lakshmi and Anr. (1991) 3 SCC 451
Makhan Lal Bangal vs. Manas Bhunia and Others 2000 (1) Cal.L.J. 437
Mukund Ltd. vs. Mumbai International Airport & Ors. 2011 (5) Bom.C.R. 456
Rev. Dr. Ignatius Dcunha and Anr. vs. Rev. Father Denish Chittarajan Kamath 1992 (1) Bom.C.R. 647
Sankaran Govindan Vs. Lakshmi Bharathi and Others AIR 1974 SC 1764
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.