IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
The Grampanchayat, Nadiwadi – Petitioner
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO.8065, 8067, 8068, 8069, 8070, 8071, 8072, 8073, 8074, 8075, 8076 OF 2015
DECIDED ON : 28.09.2015
Village Panchayats - Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act - 28 - The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act - Rule 36(15) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules 1967 - The court discussed the application of Rule 36(15) and its interpretation in the context of the election process for the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Aurad, and the rights of the newly elected members of the Gram Panchayats to cast their votes. The court concluded that the petitioners' applications under Rule 36(15) were filed after the last date for nomination, and therefore, the ballot papers/votes cast by the newly elected members were directed to be discarded, and the results of the elections were to be declared based on the votes of the members in the final Voters' List.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioners, representing Gram Panchayats falling within the jurisdiction of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Aurad, filed grievances on behalf of the newly elected members of the Gram Panchayats. The dispute arose from the inclusion of names in the final Voters' List and the right of the newly elected members to cast their votes in the elections scheduled for 09/08/2015. The petitioners' applications under Rule 36(15) were filed after the last date for nomination.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the petitioners' applications under Rule 36(15) were filed after the last date for nomination, and therefore, the ballot papers/votes cast by the newly elected members were directed to be discarded, and the results of the elections were to be declared based on the votes of the members in the final Voters' List.
Issues: The main issue was the interpretation and application of Rule 36(15) in the context of the election process for the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Aurad, and the rights of the newly elected members of the Gram Panchayats to cast their votes.
Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Rule 36(15) and its application to the specific timeline of the election process, concluding that the petitioners' applications were filed after the last date for nomination, and therefore, the ballot papers/votes cast by the newly elected members were directed to be discarded.
Final Decision: The court discharged the rule, directed the ballot papers/votes cast by the newly elected members to be discarded, and ordered the results of the elections to be declared based on the votes of the members in the final Voters' List.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by the consent of the parties and heard finally.
2. All the petitioners in these petitions are the Gram Panchayats, who are represented by their Sarpanch / Member. These petitioners have put forth their grievance on behalf of the elected members of the gram panchayats.
3. The respondents in each of these petitions are Statutory Authorities. The Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Aurad, (Shahajani) is respondent No.5, who has not caused an appearance despite service.
4. Since an identical issue is involved in all these cases, this Court (Coram : Sunil P.Deshmukh, J.) had considered these petitions and had passed a common interim order dated 04/08/2015. It is in these circumstances that all these petitions have been heard finally together by the consent of the parties.
5. The undisputed facts in these cases are as under :
[a] Respondent No.5 APMC is situated at Aurad Shahajani and all the petitioners gram panchayats fall within the jurisdiction of the said APMC.
[b] The term of the gram panchayats was to end in July, 2015.
[c] Elections to the members of the gram panchayat for the new terms were held on 23/04/2015 and the results of the elections were declared on 24/04/2015.
[d] The term of the newly elected members commences from the date they take charge in the gram panchayats, u/s 28 of The Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
[e] All the newly elected members of the petitioner/gram panchayats, represented by their Sarpanch / Members in these petitions are aggrieved parties.
[f] The newly elected members of the petitioners / gram panchayats have authorized their representatives by passing a Resolution to espouse their cause and put forth their grievance before the Election Officer and before this Court.
[g] On 22/05/2015, the final Voter’s List was declared for the respondent No.5 APMC.
[h] None of the newly elected members of the petitioners / Gram Panchayats had taken charge as on 22/05/2015.
[i] On 22/06/2015, the election programme for respondent No.5 APMC was declared.
[j] 06/07/2015 was the last date for filing of the nomination papers for contesting the elections of respondent No.5 APMC.
[k] In between 22/07/2015 and 28/07/2015, all the elected members of the petitioners / Gram Panchayats assumed charge.
[j] On 01/08/2015, the representatives of the newly elected members as well as the Gram Panchayats filed objections / complaints before respondent No.3 District Deputy Registrar Co.operative Societies, Latur (in short, DDR) under Rule 36(15) of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Rules 1967 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1967), for seeking inclusion of their names in the final list of voters.
[k] By the impugned order dated 01/08/2015, the DDR declined to entertain the said complaint and accordingly rejected the complaints.
[l] This Court, by its order dated 01/08/2015 had granted interim relief in similar cases in WP No.7950/2015.
[m] This Court, therefore, by its order dated 04/08/2015, granted interim relief to all these petitioners by virtue of which they were permitted to cast their votes in a separate ballot box on the date of polling 09/08/2015.
[n] Accordingly, the earlier members whose names appeared in the final voters’ list and the petitioners / members have cast their votes in two separate ballot boxes and the results were not declared under the orders of this Court.
[o] The contentions of the petitioners is that the earlier members of the petitioners / Gram Panchayats have lost their right to vote since their term ended on 23/04/2015.
[p] Though the newly elected members have taken charge in between 22/07/2015 and 28/07/2015 and since the elections were scheduled on 09/08/2015, they had a legal right to vote in the elections.
[q] By interim orders of this Court, the votes cast by the outgoing members of the petitioners / Gram Panchyats deserve to be discarded and the results deserve to be declared on the basis of the votes cast
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.