R.M.SAVANT
Central Bank of India – Appellant
Versus
Anil Puranmal Bansal – Respondent
1. Admit. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties heard forthwith.
2. The revisionary jurisdiction of this Court is invoked against the order dated 24/10/2015 passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court in Appeal No.351 of 2009 and Appeal No.61 of 2009 in Misc. Notice No.4705 of 2004 in RAE & R Suit No.1486/4851 of 1983. (“Misc. Notice No.4705 of 2004” is herein after for brevities sake referred to as “the Misc. Notice”). By the said order the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Court has held that the Application being the Misc. Notice No.4705 of 2004 filed by the Respondents herein is within limitation. The parties would be referred to as per their nomenclature in the Suit i.e. the Respondents as Plaintiffs and the Applicant as the Defendant.
3. The factual matrix involved in the above Civil Revision Application can be stated thus :
The Respondents herein i.e. the Plaintiffs are the owners and landlords of the premises i.e. Block Nos. 7A and 7B on the 7th floor of the building known as Chandermukhi, Nariman Point, Mumbai. The said premises
Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd. vs. Federal Motors
Dwarkas Nathamal vs. Balkrishna Baliram
Union of India and others vs. West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. and another (2004) 2 SCC 747.
Kunhayammed and others vs. State of Kerala and another (2000) 6 SCC 359.
Dhanapal Chettiar vs. Yesodai Ammal reported in (1979) 4 SCC 214.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.