SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Bom) 1298

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K. K. SONAWANE, JJ.
Balasaheb S/o Raghunath Haral - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra - Respondents
WRIT PETITION NO. 5535 OF 2003 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3801 OF 2015
Decided On : 30-09-2016

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Shri Santosh S. Jadhavar, Advocate.
For Respondents/State: Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, Addl.

Headnote:Constitution of India, 1950-Article 243-G-Aim and objects.-Since Article 243-G of Constitution is an extension of Article 40 of Constitution hence it came up in order to give effect to directive principle.

       Constitution of India, 1950-Article 243-G-Scope of.-Article 243-G of Constitution prescribes power, authority and responsibility of Panchayats to function as units of local self Government.

       Article 243-G read with Eleventh Schedule is not source of legislation and it is a provision that empowers a State enabling it to endow functions and devolve powers and responsibilities to the local bodies by enacting relevant laws. The local body can only implement the schemes entrusted to them by the State. It is a matter of policy of the State Legislature to decide upon enacting a law as contemplated under Article 243-G of the Constitution. However, no directions in this regard can be issued by the Court.

       The Court cannot issue any directions to the Legislature to make any particular kind of enactment. In doing so, the Court would be transgressing upon the sovereign power of the legislative Assembly to enact the law. The Court cannot direct Legislature to enact a particular law. In view of the Court in exercise of its power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India would not issue directions to the State Legislature to enact a law with reference to Article 243-G of the Constitution and it can only expect the State Legislature to enact the law. No mandamus as prayed would be issued in that regard.

       

JUDGMENT :

S.V. Gangapurwala, J.

The petitioner seeks directions to hand over agricultural subjects and it's schemes to the Zilla Parishads from the Agriculture Department as per the Government Resolution dated 01.02.2001 issued by the Government of Maharashtra.

2. Mr. Jadhavar, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the mandate of the Constitution as per Article 243-G is that, there should be decentralization of power and the powers should go to the grass root level that is the self government bodies like Zilla Parishad and Panchayat Samities. The Government of Maharashtra has issued specific Government Resolutions and orders giving effect to the Seventy-third amendment to the Constitution and directed to transfer and handover the subjects listed in Eleventh schedule of the Constitution of India, but till today the agricultural subjects and schemes under it are not transferred to the Zilla Parishads. The learned counsel submits that, this inaction on the part of the Government of Maharashtra has frustrated the legislative intention to decentralize the powers. The legislative intention behind Article 243-G of the Constitution is to decentralize the powers so that the Panchayats would function as institutions of local self government. By way of Seventy-third amendment to the Constitution, Eleventh Schedule is added to Article 243-G. In the said list twenty nine subjects are listed and it includes agriculture subject. The Government of Maharashtra pursuant thereto has issued G.R. dated 28.09.2000 thereby resolving to transfer all twenty nine subjects listed in Eleventh Schedule to the Zilla Parishad. In the said Government Resolution other aspects like financial arrangement, audit, budget, etc. are provided. The said Government Resolution was intended to be implemented from 02nd October, 2000. Thereafter the Government of Maharashtra vide G.R. dated 01.02.2001 laid down the official structure of the officers and employees to be followed in the Zilla Parishad and the way in which the officers and the employees of the Agriculture Department should be absorbed in the Zilla Parishads. A list of schemes of Agriculture Department to be handed over to Zilla Parishads is also annexed with the said Government Resolution.

3. The learned counsel submits that, thereafter, the Assistant Director of Agriculture, State of Maharashtra has issued circular on 13.02.2001 prescribing methodology to be adopted by Zilla Parishads while executing and implementing the schemes handed over to it from the Agriculture Department. The learned counsel submits that, further steps were also undertaken, however, almost all the subject matters listed in the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution and also in the Government Resolution dated 28.10.2000 except agriculture subject are transferred to Zilla Parishads. Till this date the agriculture subject and the schemes under it are not transferred to the Zilla Parishads. According to the learned counsel, agriculture is an important subject touching to the rural life. The Indian economy is based on agriculture. It is mandatory and obligatory for the Government of Maharashtra to issue orders for handing over the agriculture subject to the Zilla Parishads. If the same is not done, it is violative of constitutional mandate. The learned counsel submits that, the legislative intention behind the decentralization of powers and distributing it to the local self government is to strengthen the local self government and to make it public oriented. The policy of decentralization of powers and distribution of it amongst the local self government would frustrate, if an important subject like agriculture is not handed over to local self government bodies. Therefore, it is necessary to implement all the Government Resolutions and orders in respect of handing over the agriculture subject and schemes under it to the Zilla Parishads from Agriculture Department.

4. Mrs. Gondhalekar, the learned Additional Government Pleader fo
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top