R.K.DESHPANDE
Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Dushyantkumar N. Sandhya – Respondent
1. In Application, bearing B.I.R. Case No.22 of 1998, filed by the ten employees of the petitioner-Company in the Labour Court on 2-12-1998, the provisions of Section 42 read with Items 1, 2, 4 and 5 under Schedule II of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 were invoked alleging their transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department amounted to “illegal change”, as defined under sub-section (15) of Section 3 of the Bombay Industrial Relations Act. The Labour Court, by its judgment and order dated 5-12-2006, allowed the said application and passed an order, the operative portion of which, is reproduced below :
“1. The application filed by the applicants is allowed.
2. The non-applicant is directed to give original work to the applicants in the Polyester utility department and give all consequential benefits from the date of illegal change made by the non-applicant i.e. 2.10.98.
3. No order as to cost.”
The Industrial Court dismissed Appeal (BIR) No. 1 of 2007 by its judgment and order dated 9-4-2008. Hence, the employer is before this Court in this petition.
2. On 17-1-2008, this petition was admitted, granting interim relief in terms of prayer clause (iii) of t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.