SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 583

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A.S. OKA, A.A. SAYED, JJ.
Mumbai Grahak Panchayat and Another - Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Others - Respondents
Public Interest Litigation No. 156 of 2011 Along With Civil Application Nos. 155 & 157 of 2015; Along With Contempt Petition St. No. 21807 of 2016 In Public Interest Litigation No. 156 of 2011; Writ Petition No. 175, 8352 of 2016; 2547, 2544 of 2015 Alongwith Civil Application No. 1133 of 2016; Civil Application No. 2703 of 2016; Public Interest Litigation No. 133 of 2012; 52 of 2015; 31 of 2014; 14 of 2012; 216 of 2010; Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Public Interest Litigation No. 61 of 2012; Suo Moto Public Interest Litigation No. 7 of 2011; ordinary original civil jurisdiction writ petition no. 1543 of 2016; Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Public Interest Litigation No. 59 of 2013 Alongwith Chamber Summons No. 311 of 2015; Chamber Summons St. No. 339 of 2016 In Writ Petition No. 2331 of 1990; Public Interest Litigation No. 81 of 2012 (Transferred from Nagpur Bench PIL No. 35 of 2010)
Decided On : 05-05-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Shri Uday P. Warunjikar, Shri Rahul Rai i/b Ms. U.M. Jhaveri
For the Respondents: Shri A.B. Vagyani, Shri Manish Pabale, Shri S.R. Rajguru, Ms. J.N. Pandhi, Shri Uday B. Wavikar, Shri Swapnil Kamble

Important Point - It is the obligation of the State Government to provide all necessary infrastructure to the newly established as well as the existing Courts and Tribunals for the benefit of the Judicial Officers, litigants, members of the staff as well as members of the Bar.

Headnote:Constitution of India – Article 226 - This group of Public Interest Litigations/Writ Petitions concerns the issues of infrastructure of Civil and Criminal Courts and other forums in the State -The judiciary is considered to be a vital pillar of democracy - The common man has a lot of hopes and expectations from the Courts and Tribunals - Almost all Courts and Tribunals in the State of Maharashtra suffer from over flow of dockets - Almost all the Courts and Tribunals in the State lack proper infrastructure - It is an obligation of the State Government to appoint sufficient number of Judicial officers consistent with pendency and filing in the concerned Courts and Tribunals - The cadre strength should be such that there will be no pendency of old cases - It is the obligation of the State Government to provide all necessary infrastructure to the newly established as well as the existing Courts and Tribunals for the benefit of the Judicial Officers, litigants, members of the staff as well as members of the Bar - The infrastructure has to be provided in such a manner that the Courts are able to function efficiently - The infrastructure has to be consistent with the concept of dignity of the Court - The Registrar (Judicial-I) shall seek necessary directions for placing the disposed of Petitions before the same Bench or before a Bench of which one of us is a party.

       Result – Petitions disposed of.

JUDGMENT :

A.S. Oka, J.

OVERVIEW

1. Though submissions were fully heard on 26th October 2016, the Petitions were fixed for rehearing on 31st January 2017 and 31st March 2017 to enable the parties to make submissions on the basis of the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Imtiyaz Ahmed.

2. This group of Public Interest Litigations/Writ Petitions concerns the issues of infrastructure of Civil and Criminal Courts in the State, Consumer Fora at State level and District level under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short “the said Act of 1986”), the Cooperative Courts and the Cooperative Appellate Courts established under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 (for short “the said Act of 1960”) and the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal in Mumbai established under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short “M.V. Act”). The judiciary is considered to be a vital pillar of democracy. The common man has a lot of hopes and expectations from the Courts and Tribunals. Therefore, almost all Courts and Tribunals in the State of Maharashtra suffer from over flow of dockets. Almost all the Courts and Tribunals in the State lack proper infrastructure.

3. As on 4th May 2017, going by the figures available on National Judicial Data Grid, in Civil and Criminal Courts, Cooperative Courts and Cooperative Appellate Courts, Labour Courts and Industrial Courts as well as Family Courts in the State, total 32,39,623 cases were pending. Out of which, 21,30,614 were criminal cases. 15.32% cases were more than five years' old cases. Total 33,711 cases were pending as of 4th May 2017 in the Family Courts in the State. On that date, total 9590 case were pending in the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal at Mumbai. We are reproducing these figures only to show the importance of the issue of lack of availability of adequate number of Judges and lack of proper infrastructure to the Courts and Tribunals in the State. There are 407 Court Complexes in the State of traditional Civil and Criminal Courts out of which 72 are in the properties taken on rent.

LEGAL POSITION

4. Before we go into the factual details, the legal position will have to be restated so that the facts can be considered in light of the legal position. Part IV of the Constitution of India contains the Directive Principles of the State Policy. The Article 39A incorporated in Part IV of the Constitution of India reads thus:-

“39A. Equal justice and free legal aid. The State shall secure that the operation of the legal system promotes justice, on a basis of equal opportunity, and shall, in particular, provide free legal aid, by suitable legislation or schemes or in any other way, to ensure that opportunities for securing justice are not denied to any citizen by reason of economic or other disabilities.”

5. The obligation of the State to the Judiciary will have to be considered in the light of the aforesaid directive principle of the State Policy. The issue of obligation of the State Government to provide infrastructure to the Judiciary came up for consideration in the case of Purshottam Manohar Kamone V. State of Maharashtra, 2001(4) Mh.L.J. 320. The Paragraph 6 of the said decision reads thus:-

“6. It is no longer debatable and rather it is well settled that the speedy justice is an ingredient of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and, therefore, each litigant has a fundamental right of a speedy justice. That being so, it is the corresponding obligation of the State to constitute sufficient number of Courts, Tribunals and forums so that a litigant, who has knocked the door of the Court or Tribunal, is able to get justice speedy. Taking into consideration the huge pendency of motor accident claim cases at Nagpur, expected future filing and slow disposal of such cases, it is necessary for the State Government to provide sufficient Motor Accident Claims Tribunals at Nagpur. This is essential to















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top