SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 547

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY (NAGPUR BENCH)
VASANTI A. NAIK, SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.
Pradeep s/o Namdeorao Ambhore - Appellant
versus
Sau. Pallavi Pradeep Ambhore - Respondent
Family Court Appeal NO.158 of 2014
Decided On : 25/26-04-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. S.J.Kadu, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. M.Badar, Advocate

Important Point - The judgment of the Family Court is hereby set aside. The petition filed by the husband for annulment of marriage under Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act is allowed. The marriage between the parties stands annulled under the provisions of Section 12(1)(c) of the Act.

Headnote:Hindu Marriage Act – Section 13 (1)(ia) and (v) - The appellant husband has challenged the judgment of the Family Court dismissing the Petition filed by the appellant for a declaration that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent wife is null and void, under the provisions of Section 12(1)(c) of the HMA - The Family Court has committed an error in rejecting the evidence of the husband that the wife was aware about the disease suffered by her before the solemnization of the marriage - If one party alleges that the other party has the knowledge about some fact and tenders oral evidence stating so, as stated hereinabove, it would be necessary for the other party who allegedly has the knowledge about the fact to enter into the witness box, at least to state that he/she had not known it - As soon as that is said, the onus would again shift on the other party - The wife failed to enter into the witness box and in our view just to escape the cross-examination from the side of the husband, which may have proved the case of the husband that the wife knew about the disease before the marriage - Family Court has not appreciated the evidence in the right perspective while dismissing the petition filed by the husband - Leveling of false allegations against the husband, specially in respect of demand of dowry and failing to prove the same would tantamount to cruelty - Decree of nullity in favour of the husband it would not be necessary to grant a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty as, as soon as we hold that the marriage is a nullity - There is no question of dissolving the marriage under Section 13 of the Act.

       Result - Family Court Appeal is allowed.

JUDGMENT:

VASANTI A. NAIK, J.

1. By this Family Court Appeal, the appellant husband has challenged the judgment of the Family Court, Akola, dated 5th July 2011, dismissing the Petition filed by the appellant for a declaration that the marriage between the appellant and the respondent wife is null and void, under the provisions of Section 12(1)(c) of the Hindu Marriage Act. By the said judgment, the alternate prayer of the appellant that a decree of divorce may be granted, under Section 13 (1)(ia) and (v) of the Hindu Marriage Act, was also rejected.

2. Few facts giving rise to the petition are stated thus: The appellant husband (hereinafter referred to as ‘the husband’) was married with the respondent wife (hereinafter referred to as ‘the wife’) at Khamgaon, on 10.06.2009, as per the customs prevailing in the community The husband and the wife belong to the Buddhist community. After the marriage, the wife started residing in the matrimonial home, at Akola. In the petition filed by the husband for a declaration that the marriage is a nullity and/or for a decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty, it is pleaded by the husband that within three months of the marriage, the wife was taken by her mother and sister to Khamgaon, for rest. It is pleaded that there was a telephonic call from the father of the wife to the husband on 11.10.2009 to immediately come to Khamgaon as the wife was hospitalized in the hospital of Dr.Umesh Badhe at Khamgaon. According to the husband, he went to Khamgaon at about 1.30 pm, as he was anxious to know about the health of the wife. It is pleaded that the husband became aware that the wife was suffering from a serious problem concerning her health. It is pleaded that the wife was then referred to Ashok Hospital at Akola, on 14.10.2009 and after conducting various tests, such as, CT scan, Xray, blood reports, it was suggested by Dr.Agrawal that the wife should be referred to Ozone Multi Speciality Hospital and Critical Care Centre, in Akola, for treatment. The wife was admitted in the Ozone Hospital in the Intensive Care Unit at about 10.00 pm. It is pleaded that the past history of the wife revealed that she was treated by the Doctors at Khamgaon, mainly, Dr.Umesh Badhe and it was found that the wife was suffering from incurable disease ie, ‘Sickle Cell Anemia’. The husband pleaded that sickle cell anemia is hereditary and it was explained in the petition as to what are the causes and the symptoms of the said disease. After explaining about the disease, it was pleaded that the children of the person suffering from sickle cell anemia, are often smaller than the other children whereas the adults with sickle cell anemia are often slender and smaller in size than the normal adults. It was pleaded that two forms of strokes could occur in people suffering from sickle cell anemia one form could occur when the blood vessel in the brain is blocked and the other form could occur when the blood vessel in the brain bursts. It is pleaded that a person suffering from sickle cell anemia could suffer a stroke. It is pleaded that the wife was suffering from sickle cell anemia and as a result of the same, she had a paralytic attack and was hospitalized for long. It is pleaded that in the Ozone Hospital several tests were performed on the wife and it was confirmed from the reports like MRI, brain test, CT scan, Xray, blood reports etc. that the wife suffered from sickle cell anemia and paralysis. It is pleaded that when the wife was taking treatment in Ozone hospital, she was suffering from paralysis. It is pleaded that within three months of the marriage, the aforesaid incidents occurred and on making enquiries, it was revealed to the husband that at the time of marriage the wife as well as her paternal relatives knew that the wife was suffering from sickle cell anemia but without disclosing the said fact to the husband, the husband’s consent for the marriage, was secured. It is pleaded that the husband became aware on enq



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top