S.C. Dharmadhikari, J.

1. When this appeal was mentioned before this Bench on Thursday, i.e. 16th March, 2017, a request was made to continue the ad-interim order further as it was operative only till 16th March, 2017. The request to continue it further was opposed by the contesting respondent No.1. Bearing in mind the nature of the order passed on 23rd January, 2017, we indicated to both sides that the impugned order refuses to restrain the encashment of the bank guarantee, and this appeal being directed to be disposed of finally, it would not be proper to go on granting such ad-hoc extensions. We, therefore, with the consent of both sides, placed the appeal itself for disposal at the admission stage on 17th March, 2017. As soon as it was called out, we indicated to both sides that one of us (B.P. Colabawalla, J.) holds the shares in the petitioner-appellant-company. If any party has objection, he would like to recuse himself. Both senior counsel, on instructions, stated that they have no objection to this Bench hearing and disposing of this appeal. On this understanding we have proceeded further. Hence, admit. Respondents waive service. By consent, heard finally. Paper-b