D.P.WADHWA, S.SAGHIR AHMAD
Hindustan Construction Company LTD. : State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar: Hindustan Construction Co LTD. – Respondent
The court emphasized that a Bank Guarantee (BG) must be invoked strictly in accordance with its explicit terms. If the BG specifies that it is applicable only for a particular stage of work or under certain conditions, then any invocation outside those stipulated conditions would be considered invalid. Deviating from the prescribed terms or conditions undermines the enforceability of the invocation, rendering it illegal. The guarantee's language and conditions are fundamental, and any invocation that does not adhere precisely to these terms would not be legally valid.
Judgment
S. Saghir Ahmad, J.-Leave granted in both the Special Leave Petitions.
2. Hindustan Construction Company Limited (for short, ‘HCCL’) was awarded a contract for the construction of Icha Dam across the river Kharkai in village Kuju by the State of Bihar (for short, ‘the defendants’). The contract was awarded in the sum of Rs. 39,71,31,019/- on 25.4.1989. The period of contract was 42 months and the work was to be completed by 24th of October, 1992. In terms of the agreement, HCCL was required to furnish, and it did furnish, a Bank Guarantee for 10 per cent of the contract price as “Performance Guarantee” in the sum of Rupees Three Crores Ninety Seven Lakhs Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Two only. Another Bank Guarantee which was required to be furnished by HCCL, and which it did furnish, was the Guarantee against “Mobilisation Advance” which was to be provided by the defendants from time to time to the HCCL during the course of the contract. HCCL has already furnished fifty “Mobilisation Advance” Bank Guarantees aggregating in all to Rs. 532 lacs. In addition to these Bank Guarantees, HCCL had also furnished another “Mobilisation Advance” Bank Guarantee dated 2.7.1991 f
U.P. Cooperative Federation Ltd. v. Singh Consultants & Engineers Pvt. Ltd.
Svenska Handelsbanken v. Indian Charge Chrome
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Maharashtra State Electricity Board
Hindustan Steel Works Construction Ltd. v. G.S. Atwal & Co. (Engineers) (P) Ltd.
National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. Flowmore (P) Ltd.
State of Maharashtra v. National Construction Co.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.