SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 838

RAVINDRA V.GHUGE
Suklal s/o Kalu Thorat – Appellant
Versus
Ramkrushna s/o Hari Wani – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the petitioners:Mr. L.V. Sangit, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

1. By this petition, the petitioner seeks to challenge the judgment dated 28/10/1988 passed by the 5th Joint Civil Judge, J.D. Jalgaon in Regular Civil Suit No.530/1985 by which the original defendant was held guilty of causing nuisance and annoyance u/s 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the 1947 Act) and was directed to vacate the possession of the tenanted portion. The petitioner is further aggrieved by the judgment of the Additional District Judge, Jalgaon dated 20/06/1996 delivered in Civil Appeal No.322/1988, filed by the defendant, confirming the order of the Trial Court.

2. The petitioner/original defendant and the respondent/original plaintiff having passed away, are represented by their LR’s.

3. Prayer clause 10(A) set out in the petition reads as under :-

“That, the record and proceedings of the judgment and order dated 28/10/1988 and 17/01/1998 passed by Vth Joint Civil Judge, J.D. Jalgaon in Regular Civil Suit No.530/1985 as confirmed by the judgment and decree, dated 20.6.1996 passed by Additional District Judge, Jalgaon in Civil Appeal No.322/88, be called for and after examining the lega



















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top