F.M.REIS, NUTAN D.SARDESSAI
Sussanne Khan Previously known as Sussanne Roshan – Appellant
Versus
State of Goa, Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court Panaji, Goa – Respondent
F.M. Reis, J.
Heard Shri Nitin Sardessai, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. S.R. Rivankar, learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the Respondent nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Shirish Gupte, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the Respondent no. 3.
2. Rule. Heard forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents, waive service.
3. The above Petition seeks, inter alia, to quash and set aside the FIR bearing no. 119 of 2016 registered with the Panjim Police Station for offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. Briefly, it is the case of the Petitioner that she is the sole Proprietor of Sussanne Khan House of Design previously known as Sussanne Roshan House of Design, who has been in the business for the last fifteen years and has been engaged in several projects as a Design Company. It is further the contention of the Petitioner that the Respondent no. 3 who is the Complainant, executed a written contract with the Petitioner thereby engaging the services of the Petitioner for providing services for professional designing of certain villas to be constructed in a property at Goa. The scope of
Anil Mahajan v. Bhor Industries Ltd.
ARCI v. Nimra Cerglass Technics (P) Ltd.
HMT Watches Limited v. M. A. Abida
Hridaya Ranjan Prasad Verma v. State of Bihar
Inder Mohan Goswami v. State of Uttaranchal
Madhav Rao Kiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandrojirao Angre
Rishipal Singh v. State of uttar Pradesh
Shiromani Gurdwara Grabandhak Committee, Amritsar v. Som Nath Dash
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.