SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1392

SWAPNA JOSHI
Umesh Dharamdas Landge – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondent: Shamsi Haider

JUDGMENT :

1. This appeal has been directed against the judgment and order passed by the learned 6th Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No. 558 of 2001 delivered on 13-06-2003, whereby the learned trial Judge had convicted the accused under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/-, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 2 months.

2. I have heard Mrs. Shamsi Haider, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The appellant and his counsel remained absent. With the assistance of the learned APP, I have gone through the record of the case.

3. The prosecution case, in nutshell, is that:

In the year 2001, the victim was residing with her mother at Antuji Nagar, Police Station Kotwali, Nagpur. The father of the victim expired about 4 to 5 months prior to the incident. At the relevant time, the victim was studying in 7th standard in Jayvijar Primary School, Bhandewadi. Her mother was doing a labour work at Kalmana Market, Nagpur. The appellant/accused was also residing at Antuji Nagar, Nagpur. On the date of incident i.e. on 27-06-2001, the appellant/accused came to













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top