SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1612

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AT AURANGABAD BENCH
R.M. BORDE, VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
Private Nursing Schools and Colleges Management Association, Through its President, Dr. Balasaheb & Another – Petitioners
Versus
The Union of India Through its Secretary Ministry of Health and Family Welfare & Others – Respondents
Writ Petition Nos. 11260 & 10639 of 2017
Decided On : 09-10-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:P.M. Shah, Senior Counsel instructed by S.P. Shah, V.D. Hon, Senior Counsel instructed by A.V. Hon, Aadvocate.
For the Respondent:V.S.R. Krishna alongwith Mr. Alok Sharma, Bhushan Kulkarni, Standing Counsel, S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P., C.A. Jadhav, Anandsingh Bayas, M.D. Narwadkar, Advocates.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Indian Nursing Council does not have the authority to grant recognition to nursing institutions in the State of Maharashtra, and the State Council and Health University have the power to grant permission and affiliation for nursing courses.

Headnote:

Indian Nursing Council - Recognition of Nursing Institutions - Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947, Maharashtra Nursing Act, 1966, Maharashtra Universities of Health Sciences Act, 1998 - The judgment discusses the authority of the Indian Nursing Council to grant recognition to nursing institutions and the interplay between the Central and State legislation. It highlights key legal provisions such as sections 10 to 14 of the Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947, and sections 25 and 26 of the Maharashtra Nursing Act, 1966. The judgment emphasizes that the State Council has the power to grant recognition and affiliation, and the Indian Nursing Council does not have the authority to grant recognition to nursing institutions in the State of Maharashtra.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners, a public trust and an educational institution, sought a declaration that the Indian Nursing Council had no authority to grant recognition to institutions imparting nursing courses and requested writs of prohibition and mandamus to restrain the Council from publishing material indicating the need for recognition from it. The petitioners argued that the State Nursing Council and the Maharashtra University of Health Sciences had the power to grant permission and affiliation for nursing courses.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the Indian Nursing Council did not have the authority to grant recognition to nursing institutions in Maharashtra and prohibited the Council from publishing material indicating the need for recognition from it. The court also directed the State Council and Health University to publish that degrees and diplomas awarded by institutions without Indian Nursing Council approval would have applicability only in the State and that the students receiving such degrees or diplomas would be entitled to practice within the State only.

Issues: The issues included the authority of the Indian Nursing Council to grant recognition, the interplay between the Central and State legislation, and the validity of degrees and diplomas awarded by institutions without Indian Nursing Council approval.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the State Council had the power to grant recognition and affiliation, and the Indian Nursing Council did not have the authority to grant recognition to nursing institutions in Maharashtra. The judgment emphasized the restrictions on the applicability of degrees and diplomas awarded by institutions without Indian Nursing Council approval.

Final Decision: The court declared that the Indian Nursing Council had no authority to grant recognition to nursing institutions in Maharashtra and prohibited the Council from publishing material indicating the need for recognition from it. The court also directed the State Council and Health University to publish the restrictions on the applicability of degrees and diplomas awarded by institutions without Indian Nursing Council approval.

JUDGMENT :

R.M. Borde, J.

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the respective parties.

2. Parties are referred to as per their status in Writ Petition No. 11260/2017.

3. Petitioner is a public trust registered under the provisions of Societies Registration Act as well as Maharashtra Public Trust Act, 1950. The President of petitioner-trust has been authorised to present the petition by the trust.

4. Petitioner registered management association consists of membership of about 400 schools and colleges those are active in imparting training to the nursing students and conducting private nursing schools and colleges. The private schools and colleges are situate in the entire State of Maharashtra. Petitioner-association is praying for issuance of declaration that the Indian Nursing Council respondent no. 5 has no authority to grant recognition to the institutions imparting nursing courses such as Auxiliary Nurse and Midwife course (ANM), General Nursing and Midwifery (GNM), Bachelor of Nursing (B.Sc.), Post Basic Bachelor of Nursing (P.B.B.Sc.) and Master of Nursing (M.Sc.). Petitioner is also praying for issuance of writ of prohibition restraining respondent no. 5 from publishing on its website material indicating that the institutions imparting nursing course have to obtain recognition from respondent no. 5. Writ of mandamus is also requested to be issued directing the Indian Nursing Council to remove forthwith all such material from its website including the material which indicates that the institutions imparting nursing course have to obtain recognition from respondent no. 5.

5. Writ Petition No.10639/2017 is presented by the educational institution imparting training to Basic B.Sc. Nursing and Post Basic B.Sc. Nursing students. Petitioner-educational institution also prays for grant of identical relief.

6. According to petitioners, respondents no. 6 and 7 are empowered to grant permission/affiliation to operate nursing schools/colleges in observance of the procedure prescribed under the Maharashtra Nursing Act, 1966 as well as Maharashtra Universities of Health Sciences Act, 1998. Petitioners contend that the institutions imparting nursing course have already commenced admission process for the academic year 2017-2018 and, the nursing courses are likely to commence from September, 2017 whereas the cut off date prescribed is 31st October, 2017. Grievance is made that in view of material, published by respondent no. 5 on their website, enlisting the institutions recognised by the Indian Nursing Council, the State Government has also stipulated condition in respect of securing permission/renewal of validity every year from the Indian Nursing Council for disbursement of scholarship to students as well as for referring the students for admission. It is the contention of petitioners that the Maharashtra Nursing Council has also accorded permission to enroll students for B.Sc. P.B.Sc and M.Sc. nursing courses for the academic year 2017-2018 in respective colleges operated by members of petitioner-association. According to petitioners, the authority of the Indian Nursing Council is limited to evaluating the standard of education, which includes prescription of appropriate syllabus, norms of training and prescription of appropriate infrastructure for conducting courses etc. The Indian Nursing Council does not have authority to grant recognition or affiliation and the authority vests with the State Nursing Council under the State Act. Petitioners contend that respondent no. 5 Indian Nursing Council is indulging in misuse of the powers in violation of the provisions of Indian Nursing Council Act, 1947. Petitioners contend that the stand of the Indian Nursing Council is contrary to the directives issued by the Honourable Supreme Court as well as various High Courts from time to time.

7. Affidavit-in-reply has been tendered on behalf of respondent no. 5 Indian Nursing Council, wherein
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top