SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 1916

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.
Mahadeo Shripad Deo (Decd) through LRs Laxmibai Madhav Deo & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
Purushottam Shripad Deo (Decd.) through LRs Shalini Prabhakar Vatgikar & Ors. - Respondents
First Appeal No.515 of 1989
Decided On : 22-12-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants :Mr. S.N. Deshpande, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. A.A. Garge a/w. Mr. J.H. Oak, Niranjan Kulkarni, Advocate, Mr. Yogesh Dabke, AGP.

The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of wills and bequests in the context of property acquisition, and the applicability of the Indian Succession Act and the Hindu Succession Act in determining the rights of legal heirs.

Headnote:

Land Acquisition Act - Property Dispute - Section 18, Section 30 - Summary of Acts and Sections: The court discussed the provisions of Section 8 read with Schedule 1 of the Hindu Succession Act, and Section 163 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925. The court also referred to Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act in the context of apportionment of compensation.

Fact of the Case:

The case involved a property dispute between the legal heirs of the deceased owner Shripad Deo regarding the apportionment of compensation granted by the State of Maharashtra under the Land Acquisition Act. The dispute arose from the acquisition of two lands originally owned by Shripad Deo.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the land purchased by Shripad in the name of his son Mahadev was intended as a gift and not a benami transaction. The court also held that the bequest of land to Sudha Deshpande remained valid despite the acquisition by the government.

Issues: The issues included the validity of the will, the status of the land purchased in the name of Mahadev, and the apportionment of compensation among the legal heirs.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of the will, the intention behind the purchase of the land in Mahadev's name, and the applicability of the Indian Succession Act and the Hindu Succession Act in determining the rights of the legal heirs.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, set aside the judgment of the trial court, and directed the apportionment of compensation among the legal heirs according to the findings.

JUDGMENT :

1. This First Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 21st December, 1988 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Solapur in Land Reference No. 17 of 1980 wherein compensation granted by opponent no. 7/State of Maharashtra is apportioned.

2. The facts of the case, in brief, are as under :

The respondents, i.e., the original petitioners, have filed the reference under section 18 read with section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act. The original petitioners are four brothers and widow and children of deceased brother Shrikant Shripad Deo. The opponents are deceased brother Mahadev Shripad Deo, his legal heirs and sisters of the petitioners and legal heirs of deceased sister of the petitioners. This is a property dispute between the children of original owner Shripad Deo. Some of the children are expired and therefore, their legal representatives have stepped in their shoes. The State of Maharashtra has acquired two lands bearing survey nos. 89A/1F admeasuring 40Ares and survey no. 89A/1F admeasuring 1 H 22 R originally owned by Shripad Deo. The State of Maharashtra by notification dated 31st March, 1980 passed award under section 12(2) of the Land Acquisition Act and granted total compensation of Rs.1,59,252/- for two lands with break up of Rs.41,400/- and Rs.1,17,852/-. The petitioners and respondents neither challenged the amount of compensation nor did they ask for enhancement of the said compensation but a Reference was made before the District Court, Solapur to apportion the amount of compensation between the children of Shripad Deo. The genealogy of the family of Shripad Deo is as follows :

     

(i) Mahadev Shripad Deo

(ii) Purshottam Shripad Deo

(iii) Shantaram Shripad Deo

(iv) Ramdas Shripad Deo

(v) Shrikant Shripad Deo

 

 

Sons

 

(vi) Parwatibai Bhalchandra Kulkarni

(vii) Sunanda Shripad Thite

(viii) Sudha Nanasaheb Deshpande

 

Daughters

 

3. The petitioners/brothers in their reference contended that they are the sons of deceased Shripad Deo and therefore, they only have the right over the amount of compensation of award by the Government in acquisition proceedings. Opponent no. 5 in Land Reference, i.e., sister Sudha Deshpande was the only contesting opponent and other sisters did not contest the claim of the brothers in the apportionment of compensation. Thus, as per the relief claimed by the petitioners, all brothers only can claim 1/6th share in the amount of compensation.

4. Opponent no. 1 Mahadev Shripad Deo died before his father, i.e., on 15th December, 1978. Shripad Deo died on 17th June, 1979. He has executed his last will on 21st March, 1964, i.e., much prior to his death. Thus, when award dated 31st March, 1980 was passed both Shripad and Mahadev were not alive. Sudha and other opponents contended that their father Shripad Deo during his life time has executed a valid will and as per his last wishes, the compensation of the acquired lands is to be distributed and not as per the demand made by the petitioners. The Government has issued award in respect of land bearing survey no. 89A/1G at Solapur admeasuring 1H 22R in the name of Shripad and the award in respect of land bearing survey no. 89A/1F was in the name of Mahadev. For the land of Shripad, the amount of compensation is Rs.1,17,852/- and for land of Mahadev, the compensation is Rs.41,400/-. The respondents/opponents, i.e., legal representatives of deceased Mahadev 1A to 1H in the reference, they denied the averments of the petitioners that they have right in the compensation of the land bearing S.No. 89A/1F admeasuring 40R, i.e., 1 acre. It was contended by the opponents in their written statement that the said land was purchased by Shripad in the name of Mahadev and it remained continuously in the name for more than 50 years till the acquisiti
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top