SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Bom) 2076

S.B.SHUKRE
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Ramrao Marotrao Khawale – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri S.M. Ukey, Additional Public Prosecutor.

JUDGMENT :

S.B. Shukre, J.

1. This is an appeal preferred against the judgment and order dated 12th January, 2006, passed by the Special Judge Amravati, in Special (ACB) Case No.3/1992, thereby acquitting the respondent of the offences punishable under Sections 7 and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

2. In the year 1991, the respondent was serving as a Talathi and was residing at Warud, Tq. Warud, District Amravati. He was also running his office from his residence. The complainant, Namdeo Mahadeorao Bopchi, a resident of village Rajara Bazar, Tq. Warud, District Amravati was interested in getting the land bearing Survey No.9/2, admeasuring 1½ acres mutated in his name and in the name of his brother, as the same was purchased by the complainant and his brother from their neighbour, Chhatrapati Wankhade. The land was purchased about 4 years prior to lodging of the complaint in the instant case. The complaint was lodged on 2nd May 1991. Around the same time as the purchase of the land, the complainant had approached the respondent along with one Vitthalrao Punjabrao Bahurupi with a request for taking a mutation entry in respect of the said land in revenue record in his ow












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top