A.S.CHANDURKAR
National Insurance Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Gangadhar Gendrao Patankar – Respondent
A.S. Chandurkar, J.
This appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, the said Act) at the instance of the Insurance Company takes exception to the Judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Amravati by which the claim for compensation filed by respondent Nos. 1 to 5 has been allowed.
2. It is the case of the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 that on 07/04/2007, the four year old child of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 met with an accident in front of their house while answering nature's call. Said child was hit by a truck owned by respondent No. 7 and driven by respondent No. 6. Appellants therefore claimed compensation of an amount of Rs. 1,50,000/-.
3. The owner and driver of the offending vehicle remained ex-parte. The appellant filed its written statement and took a plea that it was not liable to pay any compensation as claimed on the ground that the offending vehicle was not insured with it. It was further denied that the driver of the vehicle had driven the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner.
4. Before the Claims Tribunal, the respondent No. 1 examined himself. The appellant also examined one witness for the purposes of denying its liability. By th
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Zaharulnisha and Others
Kishan Gopal and Another Vs. Lala and Others
V. Raja Kumari Vs. P. Subbarama Naidu and Another
The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. Drakshayanamma
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Bachubhai Chandubhai Vasava and Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.