RANJIT MORE, ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI
Sou. Hasina Kudbuddin Shaikh – Appellant
Versus
Karad Municipal Council, Through the Chief Officer – Respondent
Ranjit More, J.
The petitioners claim to be the owners of final plot No.481, Town Planning Scheme No.1 at Karad admeasuring about 1721.16 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “the said land”). The respondent No.1 is Karad Municipal Council established under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965. The respondent Nos.2 and 3 are the Director, Town Planning and State of Maharashtra respectively.
2. The petitioners have approached this Court invoking jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking declaration that the reservation/designation bearing No.46 on the said land in the sanctioned development plan of the respondent No.1-Karad Municipal Council has lapsed and the said property is deemed to have been released from the said reservation/designation and the same is become available for development to the petitioners.
3. The brief facts giving rise to the present petition are as follows :
The State Government sanctioned the first revised development plan of Karad Municipal Council on 1st December, 1983, in which, the said land was reserved as reservation site No.46 for Municipal purposes. This plan came
Chhabildas versus State of Maharashtra and ors. (2018) 2 SCC 784
Shrirampur Municipal Council versus Satyabhamabai Bhimaji Dawkher 5 (2013) 5 SCC 627
C. V. Shah versus State of Maharashtra 2006 3 BomCR 216.
Kishor Gopalrao Bapat and ors. Versus State of Maharashtra and anr. 2005(4) Mh.L.J. 466
Kishor S/o. Siddeshwar Wadotkar (Dr.) vs. Director of Town Planning and ors. 2007(3) Mh.L.J. 399
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.