S.S. SHINDE, J.

1. Criminal Appeal No. 919 of 2014 filed by accused No.1 Datta Somnath Jadhav (for the sake of brevity, hereinafter would be referred as accused No.1), is directed against the Judgment and Order dated 28th October, 2014 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibag thereby convicting accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 376(2)(b) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 5(c), 6 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short, “POCSO Act”) and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years. The Trial Court also convicted accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Sections 292, 509 of Indian Penal Code read with Section 14 of POCSO Act read with section 67 B of Information Technology Act and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year. The Trial Court also convicted accused No.1 for the offence punishable under Section 342 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year an