SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Bom) 1813

S.B.SHUKRE
Michelle Rejji Cope – Appellant
Versus
Murial – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N. Mohta, Adv., M. Badar, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

S.B. Shukre, J.

Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent.

2. The learned Counsel for the petitioner has placed his reliance upon the following cases :

(i). K.K. Velusamy vs. N. Palanisamy, (2011) AIR SCW 2296.

(ii). Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal vs. National Building Material Supply, Gurgaon, (1969) AIR SC 1267.

(iii). Md. Shahid Ibrahim & others vs. Mrs. Marium Iqbal & others, 2018 AIR Noc 821 (SIK.)

(iv). Atchut Upendra Raikar vs. Surya Upendra Raikar, (2006) 3 AIRBomR 366.

The learned Counsel for the respondent has also placed reliance upon the following cases :

(i). Gayathri vs. M. Girish, (2016) AIR SC 3559.

(ii). Prafulla s/o Narhar Wagh & Another. vs. Govind s/o Narayan Pimpalkar, (2017) 6 AllMR 22.

3. In the case of K.K. Velusamy, it is held by the Hon'ble Apex Court that inherent powers of the Court under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure (C.P.C. for short) can be invoked in appropriate cases to reopen evidence and/or to recall witnesses for further examination. In the case of Jai Jai Ram Manohar Lal, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that rules of procedure are intended to be a handmaid to the administration of justice and a party cannot be refus














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top